The Call for Evidence is open to anyone who wishes to contribute and is available at the link below.
From the Terms of Reference, the lived experience steering group has shaped the work of the Review around four key themes:
the role and purpose of PIP
eligibility, fairness and equity in the award of PIP
experience of claiming PIP
the changing context and the impact on PIP
The following questions are intended to prompt your thinking about the most appropriate evidence to submit:
How effectively is PIP delivering on its intended role and purpose?
Does the PIP assessment, including the assessment criteria, effectively capture the impact of long-term health conditions and disability in the modern world, and provide fair access to the right support at the right level across the benefits system?
What is the experience of people claiming PIP and does this vary for different groups of people?
What has changed in wider society and the workplace since 2013 (and might be expected to change in the future), and how has this impacted PIP and does PIP need to change accordingly?
You do not have to respond to all of the above prompts if you do not want to. You may comment on any area in the Terms of Reference using your preferred structure.
UK DWP unaware of job losses due to Access to Work cuts | Access to Work Collective posted on the topic | LinkedInThe DWP has confirmed it does not know how many
A press release from the Department for Health and Social Care about the Minimum Income Guarantee and the Disabled Facilities Grant:
£400 cash boost for disabled adults to tackle cost
Minister’s comments add fuel to Access to Work concerns | Dr Kush KanodiaIf UK Gov really wants to support disabled people into employment, then don’t cut support to Access
The Government's response to the consultation on pay gap reporting by employers of over 250 employees for ethnicity and disability, has been published and will proceed to legislation.
Please consider participating in the request, and please circulate through your networks – Colleagues in the School of Law are working with Disability Rights UK to argue for a new law
Data firm used by ICE and IDF ‘should be rejected by London NHS trust’Hackney campaigners are concerned NHS software built by controversial tech giant Palantir does not properly protect